Brad Stine - Boys and Girls Bicycles

bicycles reviews | bicycles videos | bicycles online

1. The butthurt comments prove he's gotten his message across
2. Those of you that use profanity have a shallow vocabulary...please start reading a dictionary
3. Uhh..., check out this insane Xtian comic. He believes in religion, and insists that you do to. Fuck this Ass Hat
4. Funny as fuck!
5. Society has been obsessing about gender differences for centuries. The following by themselves with nothing added are easily adequate for gender differentiation---facial hair on men, none on women---differences of voice---differences of build/proportions in shoulders/chest and hips. Bicycles marketed for girls were made minus a crossbar so girls in dresses and skirts could ride better. This is woefully outdated today as girls in PANTS are riding and nearly never in skirts. Male anatomy dictates they need a bike without a crossbar far more than girls. Male anatomy also shows they have the better anatomical claim to skirts. Next comes the chin spittle dripping Bible thumper with 22:5 of Deut. If any "C" grade attorney were asked to write a verse banning males from skirts/fancy apparel, he'd have spelled it all out. That verse is saying to not exchange garments because water was scarce and infection could be transmitted by exchange of apparel. It was a SANITARY law, not a STYLE law. The US Army killed Apaches in Arizona by means of their "gifts" of infected blankets. People's apparel habits of today have little basis in the OT or the NT either. Pants weren't even invented till men started riding horses. Then in 1431 AD "Christians" burned Joan of Arc alive because she had worn PANTS (while on horseback!) She in no way transgressed Deut 22:5. Neither are the skirt wearing Greek, Albanian, Tongan, Fijian, Tahitian, Samoan, Polynesian, Melanesian, Maori, Hawaiian, Bhutanese men of today, Dervishes in 17 countries, Basques in Spain, Portuguese Pauliteiros, Turkish Kocek, transgressing Deut 22:5, which was written to Hebrews, not to the world, and not to anyone with water to wash clothes. In Luke 7 Jesus tells the skirt wearing Roman centurion his was the greatest faith. Did Jesus not understand Deut 22:5? The Church up to the early years after the year 1900 still had young boys in dresses/skirts, something today they'd be horrified about. It was NOT about "potty training," it was rather that the skirt age to which men once equally belonged, dwindled down to its last participants as young boys. Women are wearing pants today due to one (1) cause only---the World War Two factory work. Society however expected them to change into pants/overalls only after entering war factories, and insisted they change back to skirts before leaving. Sex typing of garments was entirely caused by social forces, not by commands of God. If a man puts on a bra, he has finally stepped over a line. In AD 393, Rome exiled men in pants as political subversives. In AD 867, the Bulgarians asked the Pope if they could become Christians, even though they wore pants! In AD 1550, the Italian clown Pantalone gave his name to pants. In 1876, the new York Times called for women in pants to be taken to "the best conducted hospitals for the insane." Short hair on men was caused by 1300s European military codes mandating short hair. Head lice were harder to control with long hair. Eventually people came to think short hair and pants were necessary to masculinity, as people are hopeless juveniles in their use of mere associative "reasoning." Because of the doctrine of "cross-dressing," the apparel industry is capped at a maximum of 75% of its potential size. If men want to "dress like men," they need only shave less. Neckties are a phallic symbol invented by the medieval Croatians, same as the Free Masons use the Washington and San Jacinto Monuments as phallic symbols. Neckties are medically dangerous especially to older men in hot weather. Now get your boy a so-called "girl's" bicycle, spray paint it black if you must, but spare him avoidable injury and forget about sex typing 43,489 different objects!
6. What an arrogant, rude, sexist, close minded prick. 
7. Brad your a fuckin hypocrite, your jokes stinks, and the fuckin sweats comin off ya must make you smell like your breath, SHIT. Get a real life dude, because your comedy sux, oh shit, that's right it's your income, sori my bad. 
8. This guy thinks he's Robin Williams but for Christians.... I'm guessing that in the normal comedy circuit he couldn't hack it. Much like you find various musicians doing the same within the music industry, unable to make it within wider market because they are rubbish, so move to creating jingle jangle nonsense praising God for Christians. 
9. Not an organ
10. Damn those Public Schools - teaching science and all that bullshit!
11. I don't know what weird 1950's sitcom this guy was raised in....but I was taught not to hit ANYONE.
12. What a Doofus
13. This is comedy?
14. This guy thinks boys bikes having a cross bar is good idea. No wonder he believes in 'inteligent' design. Idiot!
15. it's equal to the amount of pain when giving birth* Fixed that bit.
16. Just gonna make note of this, girls can't understand the pain guys go through when they are kicked in the nuts. In fact, it's equal to the amount of pain, just in a lot shorter of a time. And honestly? Saying you understand the pain? Is such a dumb thing to say. Because there are so many different variants of what could happen WHEN you are kicked in the nuts. It's like saying 'I understand how you feel' to someone who's depressed. You just don't know.
17. YES. Yes I will buy every DVD this man has made. Where has he been all my life?
18. Same here for me as a guy xD
19. Girls are allowed to hit boys in the loins, because if he is bothering her, he will leave her alone after that. Then there are the cases where a sister kicks her brother or cousin there, If he was a real man he would show no pain so his friends won't laugh at him. (Well that is the case in my little part of the world).
20. its 38:7. but i get it :) good stuff