3651View
48m 40sLenght
34Rating

A recent bill introduced in the California state senate would require adults to wear bicycle helmets and reflective clothing. The bill's author cites statistics as a reason for the government mandate. As any cyclist knows, bicycle accident statistics are shaky at best. The data is very limited. There are current laws that require lights and reflectors on bikes, but no state within the United States currently requires an adult to wear protective gear. My personal opinion is that you should ride with a helmet. Sure it only protects the very top of your head at slower speeds, but it's better than nothing. I'm not entirely sure I agree with requiring cyclists to pay out of pocket for a helmet to ride a bike though. It does infringe on personal liberty in my opinion, and it would discourage more people to ride. However, as bike infrastructure slowly becomes built to accomodate cyclists (very very slowly in the USA I might add) it does not surprise me that new law will be introduced to regulate the users who benefit most from it. As the government becomes more involved with bicyclists (be it required parking, bike lanes, registration) it is fair to argue they are opening themselves up to lawsuit, and additional regulation is often the result. Helmets have been compared to seatbelts and airbags before, but I do not believe helmets are as effective at saving your life. Better infrastructure, education, and protected bike lanes would be the ideal solution to saving lives. So, I believe helmet law should keep pace with infrastructure. Unless a state becomes bicycle friendly overnight I do not believe laws governing cyclists should change across a state overnight. LOL Thanks for watching! And please subscribe! http://www.bikeblogger.com